Xiaomi Mi9 Vs Samsung Galaxy S9
Xiaomi Mi ix vs Samsung Galaxy S9
VS
Here nosotros compared 2 flagship smartphones: the 6.39-inch Xiaomi Mi 9 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 855) that was released on February 20, 2019, against the Samsung Galaxy S9, which is powered by Exynos ix Octa 9810 and came out 12 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.
- Differences
- Review
- Specs
- Benchmarks
- Battery life
- Photographic camera
- Comments
Fundamental differences
An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Mi nine
- Has a 0.59 inch larger screen size
- The rear camera has a 2x optical zoom
- Shows 25% longer battery life (25:40 vs xx:36 hours)
- 38% meliorate performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (507K versus 366K)
- Better photographic camera quality (Co-ordinate to DxOMark rating)
- Comes with 300 mAh larger battery capacity: 3300 vs 3000 mAh
- Has 50% more RAM: 6GB versus 4GB
- Has an ultra-wide bending camera lens
- More recent Bone version: Android eleven versus ten
- The phone is one-year newer
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S9
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- 41% higher pixel density (568 vs 403 PPI)
- Optical epitome stabilization
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card upward to 400GB
- Stereo speakers
- Supports Dolby Atmos audio technology
- Better grip in easily – the body is v.nine mm narrower
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
- The front-facing camera can record video at 1440p
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accurateness, brightness
Operation
CPU/GPU performance in apps and games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Connectivity
Networks, ports, information transmission
NanoReview score
Final comparison evaluation
Value for money
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money.
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Display
| Blazon | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.39 inches | 5.viii inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 1440 10 2960 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | xix.5:nine | 18.five:9 |
| PPI | 403 ppi | 568 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 658 nits |
| HDR back up | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, HDR10 |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass vi | Corning Gorilla Glass v |
| Screen-to-trunk ratio | 85.2% | 83.6% |
| Display features | - Always-On Brandish - DC Dimming | - Always-On Display |
| RGB color infinite | 95.4% | - |
| PWM | 245 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time | 4.two ms | 7 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Tiptop brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]
Pattern and build
| Height | 157.v mm (half dozen.two inches) | 147.7 mm (5.81 inches) |
| Width | 74.six mm (2.94 inches) | 68.7 mm (2.7 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.vi mm (0.3 inches) | 8.five mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 173 gramm (6.ane oz) | 163 gramm (v.75 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP68 |
| Rear material | Drinking glass | Drinking glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metallic |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Royal | Black, Gold, Greyness, Blue, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yep, in-display | Yes, rear |
Performance
Tests of Xiaomi Mi ix and Samsung Galaxy S9 in the benchmarks
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9810 |
| Max. clock | 2840 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU cores | eight (1 + three + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at ane.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver) - three cores at 2.42 GHz: Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) - 1 core at ii.84 GHz: Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) | - 4 cores at 1.ix GHz: Cortex-A55 - iv cores at ii.9 GHz: Exynos M3 |
| L3 cache | two MB | 4 MB |
| Lithography procedure | vii nanometers | 10 nanometers |
| Graphics | Adreno 640 | Mali-G72MP18 |
| GPU clock | 585 MHz | 572 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~899 GFLOPS | ~658 GFLOPS |
| RAM size | vi GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Retentiveness clock | 2133 MHz | 1794 MHz |
| Channels | ii | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.one |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory card max. size | - | Upward to 400 GB |
Benchmarks
Geekbench v (Single-Core)
| CPU | 145198 | 106403 |
| GPU | 179503 | 131325 |
| Memory | 76010 | 59895 |
| UX | 109413 | 69985 |
| Total score | 507621 | 366912 |
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 93% | 93% |
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | thirteen FPS |
| Graphics score | 3054 | 2268 |
| PCMark 3.0 score | 10447 | 6249 |
Software
| Operating organization | Android 9.0 (Can be upgraded to Android eleven) | Android viii.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 10) |
| ROM | MIUI 12.0.i | I UI 2,one |
| Bone size | thirteen.5 GB | 14 GB |
Bombardment
| Capacity | 3300 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Accuse power | 27 West | xv W |
| Bombardment blazon | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (xx W) | Yes, Qi/PMA (ten W) |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes, Quick Charge 4 (l% in 30 min) | Aye (40% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:thirty hr | 1:35 60 minutes |
| Web browsing | 07:01 hr | 06:04 hour |
| Watching video | fourteen:57 hr | ten:57 hr |
| Gaming | 03:32 hour | 02:42 hour |
| Standby | 84 60 minutes | lxx hr |
Camera
Specs and photographic camera exam of smartphones
| Matrix | 48 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Paradigm resolution | 8000 x 6000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Upward to 60FPS | Upwards to 240FPS |
| Slow move | 960 FPS (1080p) | 960 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 117° | - |
| Lenses | iii (48 MP + 12 MP + sixteen MP) | ane (12 MP) |
| Broad (principal) lens | - 48 MP - Discontinuity: f/1.viii - Focal length: 27 mm - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: ane/ii", Sony IMX586 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Laser autofocus | - 12 MP - Aperture: f/1.5 - 2.4 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 1.four micron - Sensor: 1/2.55", Samsung SAK2L3 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization |
| Telephoto lens | - 12 MP - Discontinuity: f/ii.2 - Focal length: 54 mm - Pixel size: i micron - Sensor: 1/three.6", Samsung S5K3M5 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus | - |
| Ultra-wide lens | - sixteen MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: xiii mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/3.0", Sony IMX481 (BSI CMOS) - Stage autofocus | - |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW back up | - Bokeh mode - Pro style |
| Samples | Photo samples of Xiaomi Mi 9 from DxOMark | - |
| Megapixels | xx megapixels | eight megapixels |
| Epitome resolution | 5184 x 3880 | 3264 ten 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.seven |
| Focal length | 18 mm | 25 mm |
| Pixel size | 0.9 microns | i.22 microns |
| Sensor type | CMOS | ISOCELL CMOS |
| Sensor size | i/3" | ane/3.6" |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full Hd) at xxx FPS | 1440p at 30 FPS |
DxOMark camera tests
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/chiliad/due north/ac) | Wi-Fi v (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Directly - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | five |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Blazon-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - USB-Host mode - OTG | - Charging - USB-Storage manner - OTG |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yep | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | ii |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM fashion | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | Yes |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | 18 |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | Aye |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Appear | February 2019 | February 2018 |
| Release date | April 2019 | March 2018 |
| SAR (head) | one.389 W/kg | 0.362 W/kg |
| SAR (body) | 0.99 W/kg | 1.18 Westward/kg |
| Sensors | - Hall-result sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambience light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint | - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambience light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and another specs tin can be dissimilar depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance, software, battery life, and camera are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Mi nine. But if the brandish, connectivity, pattern, and sound are more than of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy S9.
Bandage your vote
So, which phone would you lot choose?
Total votes: 53
Related comparisons
Y'all can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
Xiaomi Mi9 Vs Samsung Galaxy S9,
Source: https://nanoreview.net/en/phone-compare/xiaomi-mi-9-vs-samsung-galaxy-s9
Posted by: crusedowasobod.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Xiaomi Mi9 Vs Samsung Galaxy S9"
Post a Comment